본문으로
댓글 쓰기

Du ju andestend?

글쓴이: vedev, 2009년 3월 26일

글: 25

언어: English

vedev (프로필 보기) 2009년 3월 26일 오후 12:43:44

Dia englisxspikaz frendz!

Aj vont tu ansa ju - du ju andestend vot aj printid hia? Iz it izi or difikalt fo ju? rideto.gif

jan aleksan (프로필 보기) 2009년 3월 26일 오후 12:59:15

Aj undestend wen it iz in englisx o in fentsx, not fo ekzempl in rusien

fizikisto (프로필 보기) 2009년 3월 26일 오후 1:08:17

Grejt ajdie. Aj andestend ju veri vel in inglisx es vel es in frencx.
Me pur muxa se ne pa fasil ekrir muxa mem on frans.

vedev (프로필 보기) 2009년 3월 26일 오후 1:34:45

Senegaùlo:Ĵe kompran parfetman se ke vuz ekrive la, me parkontr eske vu osi vu me komprene ?
Si ŭi, alor on n'a plu bezŭen de l'esperanto...
Amiko, mi komprenis "vu me komprene" sole. Mi malmulte scias anglan, sed, bedaurinde, tute ne scias francan. Sed - cxu tio ne estas angla sekcio de forumo?

furrykef (프로필 보기) 2009년 3월 26일 오후 1:52:14

Senegaùlo:Ĵe kompran parfetman se ke vuz ekrive la, me parkontr eske vu osi vu me komprene ?
Si ŭi, alor on n'a plu bezŭen de l'esperanto...
French in Esperanto orthography? I think my head just exploded.

Miland (프로필 보기) 2009년 3월 26일 오후 2:04:08

vedev: du ju andestend vot aj printid hia? Iz it izi or difikalt fo ju?
Aj wud not kol it difikalt - bat wai not spel de werdz korektli? Choo vee komprenas? (Trans: du yu andestand?)

vedev (프로필 보기) 2009년 3월 26일 오후 3:01:35

Miland:
vedev: du ju andestend vot aj printid hia? Iz it izi or difikalt fo ju?
Aj wud not kol it difikalt - bat wai not spel de werdz korektli? Choo vee komprenas? (Trans: du yu andestand?)
I can explain why. Because the English spelling is terrible. why you will not produce revolution in this terrible spelling? ploro.gif

henma (프로필 보기) 2009년 3월 26일 오후 3:33:45

vedev:Dia engliŝspikaz frendz!

Aj vont tu ansa esk ju - du ju andestend vot aj printid roŭt hia? Iz it izi or difikalt fo ju? rideto.gif
I do understand, but, I would change some of your spellings... Why not "ŭont", instead of "vont", "hŭot" instead of vot??

It's difficult to reform the English orthography (again). A long time ago, English was written as spoken, but spelling was reformed too many times (to adapt it to Latin letters, to make the words more similar to their etymological origin, even when this etymological analysis was wrong rideto.gif), etc.

Senegaùlo:Ĵe kompran parfetman se ke vuz ekrive la, me parkontr eske vu osi vu me komprene ?
Si ŭi, alor on n'a plu bezŭen de l'esperanto...
As this forum is in English, I'll try to translate this for you (as much as I can, my French is not too good).
I understand perfectly this you wrote here, but, on the contrary, do you also understand me?

If yes, then Esperanto is no longer needed.
(Excuse my French rido.gif rido.gif)

Amike,

Daniel.

fizikisto (프로필 보기) 2009년 3월 26일 오후 4:53:27

I understand perfectly this you wrote here, but, on the contrary, do you also understand me?

If yes, then Esperanto is no longer needed.
Shouldn't be the correct translation:

Aj andestend perfektli ŭot ju vroŭt hir, bat on ve kontreri, du ju andestend mi?
If jes, ven esperanto is no longer nided.

furrykef (프로필 보기) 2009년 3월 26일 오후 5:05:25

vedev:why you will not produce revolution in this terrible spelling? ploro.gif
Because that would make your life easy, and life is never easy. okulumo.gif

다시 위로