前往目錄
回應

A comparison of Vikivortaro and ReVo

貼文者: mkj1887, 2017年7月24日

訊息: 6

語言: English

mkj1887 (顯示個人資料) 2017年7月24日上午9:52:35

ReVo seems to be better with technical terms than Vikivortaro seems to be. For example, Vikivortaro doesn’t even contain ‘parallelogram’, which ReVo does. On the other hand, Vikivortaro seems to be better in literary matters than ReVo seems to be. For example, Vikivortaro contains both ‘corpora’ and ‘phenomena’, neither of which does ReVo contain. (ReVo doesn’t even contain ‘phenomenon’!)

mkj1887 (顯示個人資料) 2017年7月28日下午11:48:04

Another elementary technical term missing from Vikivortaro is ‘midpoint’. (It’s also missing from ReVo, but ReVo includes
‘mid-perpendicular’ – so in ReVo’s case it is more a matter of an oversight, whereas with Vikivortaro it is par for the course.)

mkj1887 (顯示個人資料) 2017年7月29日下午8:03:19

Another elementary technical term that ReVo contains that Vikivortaro does not is ‘factorial’.

An interesting outlier case is ‘factorization’, which neither ReVo nor Vikivortaro contains, and which Benson and Wells contain only implicitly.

Indeed, ‘outlier’ is a technical term that suffers even more than ‘factorization’? Neither ReVo nor Vikivortaro contains it, and it is in Benson / Wells only to the extent that Benson contains ‘outlying’.

Roch (顯示個人資料) 2017年7月30日上午1:54:15

externalImage.png rideto.gif

mkj1887 (顯示個人資料) 2017年8月1日下午4:54:06

Another such example is ‘centroid’: ReVo has it, but Vikivortaro does not.

mkj1887 (顯示個人資料) 2017年8月2日上午11:14:24

Another excellent example is ‘interval’: Vikivortaro contains translations for the ‘literary’ senses: ‘intertempo’, ‘interspaco’ and (the British) ‘interakto’, but fails to contain the translation for the mathematical sense: ‘intervalo’, which ReVo DOES contain, and which is corroborated by PIV.

回到上端