Meddelelser: 71
Sprog: English
david_uk (Vise profilen) 19. jun. 2017 23.19.07
Vestitor (Vise profilen) 20. jun. 2017 00.04.23
Roch (Vise profilen) 20. jun. 2017 14.50.05
![lango.gif](/images/smileys/lango.gif)
Vestitor (Vise profilen) 20. jun. 2017 16.20.55
Roch:Euh... to wash your hands is certainly to be eliminated...What does this actually mean?
Roch (Vise profilen) 20. jun. 2017 16.33.12
Well, I won't go as far as masturbating... because it would be kind of vulgar here... and inappopriate in the context.
![demando.gif](/images/smileys/demando.gif)
MiMalamasLaAnglan (Vise profilen) 20. jun. 2017 20.12.31
Vestitor (Vise profilen) 20. jun. 2017 20.55.41
MiMalamasLaAnglan (Vise profilen) 21. jun. 2017 00.13.12
Vestitor:The original discussion has been debunked hasn't it?I would really like everyone to keep talking about Esperanto verb conjugation here. Other stuff is for other places.
david_uk (Vise profilen) 21. jun. 2017 11.17.12
I would really like everyone to keep talking about Esperanto verb conjugation here. Other stuff is for other places.I think it has already been said.
There is no good reason for making Esperanto more complicated.
There is also no good reason for changing the rules of Esperanto grammar. If you do make changes, you produce something that is no longer Esperanto, and that defeats the purpose of having a "Universal Language". That is exactly what happened with Ido. It is a new language related to Esperanto, but it is not Esperanto. So it becomes a competitor and over time all the different versions of Esperanto would become different languages in the same way different European languages developed from a single source.
MiMalamasLaAnglan (Vise profilen) 21. jun. 2017 20.12.05
david_uk:I never said people should use this, I just wanted to share my idea with other Esperantistoj.I would really like everyone to keep talking about Esperanto verb conjugation here. Other stuff is for other places.I think it has already been said.
There is no good reason for making Esperanto more complicated.
There is also no good reason for changing the rules of Esperanto grammar. If you do make changes, you produce something that is no longer Esperanto, and that defeats the purpose of having a "Universal Language". That is exactly what happened with Ido. It is a new language related to Esperanto, but it is not Esperanto. So it becomes a competitor and over time all the different versions of Esperanto would become different languages in the same way different European languages developed from a single source.