پستها: 71
زبان: English
david_uk (نمایش مشخصات) 19 ژوئن 2017، 23:19:07
Vestitor (نمایش مشخصات) 20 ژوئن 2017، 0:04:23
Roch (نمایش مشخصات) 20 ژوئن 2017، 14:50:05
Vestitor (نمایش مشخصات) 20 ژوئن 2017، 16:20:55
Roch:Euh... to wash your hands is certainly to be eliminated...What does this actually mean?
Roch (نمایش مشخصات) 20 ژوئن 2017، 16:33:12
Well, I won't go as far as masturbating... because it would be kind of vulgar here... and inappopriate in the context.
MiMalamasLaAnglan (نمایش مشخصات) 20 ژوئن 2017، 20:12:31
Vestitor (نمایش مشخصات) 20 ژوئن 2017، 20:55:41
MiMalamasLaAnglan (نمایش مشخصات) 21 ژوئن 2017، 0:13:12
Vestitor:The original discussion has been debunked hasn't it?I would really like everyone to keep talking about Esperanto verb conjugation here. Other stuff is for other places.
david_uk (نمایش مشخصات) 21 ژوئن 2017، 11:17:12
I would really like everyone to keep talking about Esperanto verb conjugation here. Other stuff is for other places.I think it has already been said.
There is no good reason for making Esperanto more complicated.
There is also no good reason for changing the rules of Esperanto grammar. If you do make changes, you produce something that is no longer Esperanto, and that defeats the purpose of having a "Universal Language". That is exactly what happened with Ido. It is a new language related to Esperanto, but it is not Esperanto. So it becomes a competitor and over time all the different versions of Esperanto would become different languages in the same way different European languages developed from a single source.
MiMalamasLaAnglan (نمایش مشخصات) 21 ژوئن 2017، 20:12:05
david_uk:I never said people should use this, I just wanted to share my idea with other Esperantistoj.I would really like everyone to keep talking about Esperanto verb conjugation here. Other stuff is for other places.I think it has already been said.
There is no good reason for making Esperanto more complicated.
There is also no good reason for changing the rules of Esperanto grammar. If you do make changes, you produce something that is no longer Esperanto, and that defeats the purpose of having a "Universal Language". That is exactly what happened with Ido. It is a new language related to Esperanto, but it is not Esperanto. So it becomes a competitor and over time all the different versions of Esperanto would become different languages in the same way different European languages developed from a single source.