讯息： 71
语言: English
david_uk (显示个人资料) 2017年6月21日上午11:17:12
I would really like everyone to keep talking about Esperanto verb conjugation here. Other stuff is for other places.I think it has already been said.
There is no good reason for making Esperanto more complicated.
There is also no good reason for changing the rules of Esperanto grammar. If you do make changes, you produce something that is no longer Esperanto, and that defeats the purpose of having a "Universal Language". That is exactly what happened with Ido. It is a new language related to Esperanto, but it is not Esperanto. So it becomes a competitor and over time all the different versions of Esperanto would become different languages in the same way different European languages developed from a single source.
MiMalamasLaAnglan (显示个人资料) 2017年6月21日下午8:12:05
david_uk:I never said people should use this, I just wanted to share my idea with other Esperantistoj.I would really like everyone to keep talking about Esperanto verb conjugation here. Other stuff is for other places.I think it has already been said.
There is no good reason for making Esperanto more complicated.
There is also no good reason for changing the rules of Esperanto grammar. If you do make changes, you produce something that is no longer Esperanto, and that defeats the purpose of having a "Universal Language". That is exactly what happened with Ido. It is a new language related to Esperanto, but it is not Esperanto. So it becomes a competitor and over time all the different versions of Esperanto would become different languages in the same way different European languages developed from a single source.